Comments on: MP claimed £31,000 for damage covered by insurance http://www.insurancedaily.co.uk/2009/05/26/mp-claimed-31000-for-damage-covered-by-insurance/ Daily Insurance Industry News Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:27:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Schofields http://www.insurancedaily.co.uk/2009/05/26/mp-claimed-31000-for-damage-covered-by-insurance/#comment-11264 Schofields Wed, 27 May 2009 13:11:16 +0000 http://www.insurancedaily.co.uk/?p=2647#comment-11264 Hi David, As reported by the Bolton news, an unoccupancy clause meant that the water claim would be turned down because the second home was empty. http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/4388262.Storm_brews_over_Ruth_Kelly_insurance_claim/ "Finally, yesterday lunchtime, Ms Kelly was able to confirm that yes, she had a policy, and no, she would not have been able to make a claim as it contained a specific clause which meant she would not be covered as she was not living in the house full-time". Hi David,

As reported by the Bolton news, an unoccupancy clause meant that the water claim would be turned down because the second home was empty.

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/4388262.Storm_brews_over_Ruth_Kelly_insurance_claim/

“Finally, yesterday lunchtime, Ms Kelly was able to confirm that yes, she had a policy, and no, she would not have been able to make a claim as it contained a specific clause which meant she would not be covered as she was not living in the house full-time”.

]]>